Publications

2022, Eleftheratos, K., Kapsomenakis, J., Fountoulakis, I., Zerefos, C. S., Jöckel, P., Dameris, M., ... Liley, B. …& Douvis, K., Ozone, DNA-active UV radiation, and cloud changes for the near-global mean and at high latitudes due to enhanced greenhouse gas concentrations, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(19), 12827-12855
Tags: Clouds, Ozone, Spectral UV

2022, Sullivan, J., Apituley, A., Mettig, N., Kreher, K., Knowland, K.E., Allaart, M., Piters, A., Van Roozendael, M.,Veefkind, P.. Ziemke, J.R. Kramarova, N., Weber, M., Rozanov, A., Twigg, L., Sumnicht, G., McGee, T.J., Tropospheric and Stratospheric Ozone Profiles during the 2019 TROpomi vaLIdation eXperiment (TROLIX-19), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 11137–11153, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11137-2022
Tags: Lidar, Satellite, Sonde, UVVis

2022, Mariaccia, A., Keckhut P., Hauchecorne A., Claud C., Le Pichon A., Meftah M., Khaykin S., Assessment of ERA-5 Temperature Variability in the MiddleAtmosphere Using Rayleigh LiDAR Measurements between 2005 and 2020, Atmosphere, 13 (2), 242, http://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020242
Tags: Lidar, Model, Temperature

2022, Khaykin, S.A., A. Podglajen, F. Ploeger, J. Grooß, F. Tence, S. Bekki, K. Khlopenkov, K. Bedka, L. Rieger, A. Baron, S. Beekmann, B. Legras, P. Sellitto, T. Sakai, J. Barnes, O. Uchino, I. Morino, T. Nagai, R. Wing, G. Baumgarten, M. Gerding, V. Duflot, G. Payen, J. Jumelet, R. Querel, B., A. Bourassa, B. Clouser, A. Feofilov, A. Hauchecorne, and F. Ravetta , Global perturbation of stratospheric water and aerosol burden by Hunga eruption, Communications Earth Environment, 3, 316, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00652-x
Tags: Aerosol, H2O, Lidar, Volcano

2022, Bedoya-Velásquez, A.E., Hoyos-Restrepo, M.; Barreto, A.; García, R.D.; Romero-Campos, P.M.; García, O.; Ramos, R.; Roininen, R.; Toledano, C.; Sicard, M.; Ceolato, R., Estimation of the Mass Concentration of Volcanic Ash Using Ceilometers: Study of Fresh and Transported Plumes from La Palma Volcano, Remote Sensing, 14, 5680, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225680
Tags: FTIR, Volcano

2022, Herrera, B., A. Bezanilla, T. Blumenstock, E. Dammers, F. Hase, L. Clarisse, A. Magaldi, C. Rivera, W. Stremme, K. Strong, C. Viatte, M. Van Damme, and M. Grutter, Measurement report: Evolution and distribution of NH3 over Mexico City from ground-based and satellite infrared spectroscopic measurements, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 14119–14132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14119-2022
Tags: FTIR, NH3, Satellite

2022, Shan, C., Wang, W., Xie, Y., Wu, P., Xu, J., Zeng, X., Zha, L., Zhu, Q., Sun, Y., Hu, Q., Liu, C., and Jones, N., Observations of atmospheric CO2 and CO based on in-situ and ground-based remote sensing measurements at Hefei site, Science of the Total Environment, 851, 158188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158188
Tags: CO, CO2, FTIR

2022, Wang, W. , Liu, C., Clarisse, L., Van Damme., M., Coheur, P.-F., Xie, Y., Shan, C., Hu, Q., Sun, Y., and Jones, N., Ground-based measurements of atmospheric NH3 by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry at Hefei and comparisons with IASI data, Science of the Total Environment, 287, 119256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119256
Tags: FTIR, NH3, Satellite

2022, Jalali, A., K.A. Walker, K. Strong, R.R. Buchholz, M.N. Deeter, D. Wunch, S. Roche, T. Wizenberg, E. Lutsch, E. McGee, H.M. Worden, P.F. Fogal, and J.R. Drummond, A comparison of carbon monoxide retrievals between the MOPITT satellite and Canadian High-Arctic ground-based NDACC and TCCON FTIR measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 6837–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022
Tags: CO, FTIR, Satellite

2022, Pardo Cantos, I., E. Mahieu, M. P. Chipperfield, D. Smale, J. W. Hannigan, M. Friedrich, P. Fraser, P.Krummel, M. Prignon, J. Makkor, C. Servaisj and J. Robinson, Determination and analysis of time series of CFC-11 (CCl3F) from FTIR solar spectra, in situ observations, and model data in the past 20 years above Jungfraujoch (46°N), Lauder (45°S), and Cape Grim (40°S) stations, Environmental Sciences, 2, 1487-1501, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00060A
Tags: CFC, FTIR, Model

2022, Zeng, X., Wang, W., Liu, C., Shan, C., Xie, Y., Wu, P., Zhu, Q., Zhou, M., De Mazière, M., Mahieu, E., Pardo Cantos, I., Makkor, J., and Polyakov, A., Retrieval of atmospheric CFC-11 and CFC-12 from high-resolution FTIR observations at Hefei and comparisons with other independent datasets, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 6739–6754, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6739-2022
Tags: CFC, FTIR, Validation

2022, Nedoluha, G.E., R.M. Gomez, I. Boyd, H. Neal, D.R. Allen, D. Siskind, A. Amber, and N.J. Livesey, Measurements of Mesospheric Water Vapor from 1992 to 2021 at three stations from the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127, e2022JD037227, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037227
Tags: H2O, Microwave

2022, Stauffer, R.M., A. M. Thompson, D. Kollonige, D. Tarasick, R. Van Malderen, H. G.J. Smit, H. Vömel, G. Morris, B. J. Johnson, P. Cullis, R. Stübi, J. Davies, and M. M. Yan, An Examination of the Recent Stability of Ozonesonde Global Network Data, Earth and Space Science, 9(10), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002459
Tags: Ozone, Sonde, Validation

2022, Weber, M., Arosio, C., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Fioletov, V. E., Frith, S. M., Wild, J. D., Tourpali, K., Burrows, J. P., and Loyola, D., Global total ozone recovery trends attributed to ozone-depleting substance (ODS) changes derived from five merged ozone datasets, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 6843–6859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6843-2022
Tags: Ozone, Satellite, Trends

2022, Karagkiozidis, D., Friedrich, M. M., Beirle, S., Bais, A., Hendrick, F., Voudouri, K. A., Fountoulakis, I., Karanikolas, A., Tzoumaka, P., Van Roozendael, M., Balis, D., and Wagner, T., Retrieval of tropospheric aerosol, NO2, and HCHO vertical profiles from MAX-DOAS observations over Thessaloniki, Greece: intercomparison and validation of two inversion algorithms, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 1269–1301, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1269-2022
Tags: Aerosol, Algorithm, CalVal, HCHO, NO2, UVVis

2022, Pinardi, G., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Richter, A., Valks, P., Alwarda, R., Bognar, K., Frieß, U., Granville, J., Gu, M., Johnston, P., Prados-Roman, C., Querel, R., Strong, K., Wagner, T., Wittrock, F., and Yela Gonzalez, M., Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 3439–3463, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022
Tags: OClO, Satellite, UVVis, Validation

2022, Barnes, P.W., T. M. Robson, P. J. Neale, C. E. Williamson, R. G. Zepp, S. Madronich, S. R. Wilson, A. L. Andrady, A. M. Heikkilä, G. H. Bernhard, A. F. Bais, R. E. Neale, J. F. Bornman, M. A. K. Jansen, A. R. Klekociuk, J. Martinez-Abaigar, S. A. Robinson, Q.-W. Wang, A. T. Banaszak, D.-P. Häder, S. Hylander, K. C. Rose, S.-Å. Wängberg, B. Foereid, W.-C. Hou, R. Ossola, N. D. Paul, J. E. Ukpebor, M. P. S. Andersen, J. Longstreth, T. Schikowski, K. R. Solomon, B. Sulzberger, L. S. Bruckman, K. K. Pandey, C. C. White, L. Zhu, M. Zhu, P. J. Aucamp, J. B. Liley, R. L. McKenzie, M. Berwick, S. N. Byrne, Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2021, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 21, 275–301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00176-5
Tags: Erythemal UV, Ozone, Spectral UV

2022, Bernhard, G.H., McKenzie, R.L., Lantz, K. et al., Updated analysis of data from Palmer Station, Antarctica (64° S), and San Diego, California (32° N), confirms large effect of the Antarctic ozone hole on UV radiation, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 21, 373–384, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00178-3
Tags: Ozone, Polar, Spectral UV, UVB

2022, McKenzie, R. , Liley, B., Kotkamp, M. et al., Relationship between ozone and biologically relevant UV at 4 NDACC sites, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00281-5
Tags: Ozone, Spectral UV, UVB

2022, Konopka, P., ., M. Tao, F. Plöger, D.F. Hurst, M.L. Santee, J.S. Wright, and M. Riese, Stratospheric moistening after 2000, Geophysical Research Letters, 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097609
Tags: H2O, Sonde

2022, Read, W.J., G. Stiller, S. Lossow, M. Kiefer, F. Khosrawi, D. Hurst, H. Vömel, K. Rosenlof, B.M. Dinelli, P. Raspollini, G.E. Nedoluha, J.C. Gille, Y. Kasai, P. Eriksson, C.E. Sioris, K.A. Walker, K. Weigel, J.P. Burrows, and A. Rozanov, The SPARC Water Vapor Assessment II: assessment of satellite measurements of upper tropospheric humidity, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 3377-3400, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3377-2022
Tags: H2O, Satellite, Sonde

2022, Tencé, F. , Jumelet, J., Bekki, S., Khaykin, S., Sarkissian, A., & Keckhut, P., Australian Black Summer Smoke Observed by Lidar at the French Antarctic Station Dumont d’Urville, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127, e2021JD035349, https://doi. org/10.1029/2021JD035349
Tags: Aerosol, Fire, Lidar, Sonde

2022, Di Paolantonio, M., Dionisi, D., and Liberti, G. L., A semi-automated procedure for the emitter–receiver geometry characterization of motor-controlled lidars, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 1217–1231, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1217-2022
Tags: Lidar

2022, Chouza, F., Leblanc, T., Brewer, M., Wang, P., Martucci, G., Haefele, A., Vérèmes, H., Duflot, V., Payen, G., and Keckhut, P., The impact of aerosol fluorescence on long-term water vapor monitoring by Raman lidar and evaluation of a potential correction method, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 4241–4256, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4241-2022
Tags: Aerosol, H2O, Lidar

2022, Knowland, K.E., C. A. Keller, P. A. Wales, K. Wargan, L. Coy, M. S. Johnson, J. Liu, R. A. Lucchesi, S. D. Eastham, E. Fleming, Q. Liang, T. Leblanc, N. J. Livesey, K. A. Walker, L. E. Ott, S. Pawson, NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS-CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14(6), e2021MS002852, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002852
Tags: Aerosol, Lidar, Model