Publications

2023, Poraicu, C., Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Fonteyn, D., Tack, F., Deutsch, F., Laffineur, Q., Van Malderen, R., and Veldeman, N., Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO2 measurements over Antwerp, Belgium, Geoscientific Model Development, 16, 479–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023
Tags: NO2, Satellite, Sonde

2023, Chang, K.L., O.R. Cooper, G. Rodriguez, L.T. Iraci, E.L. Yates, M.S. Johnson, A. Gaudel, D.A. Jaffe, N. Bernays, H. Clark, P. Effertz, T. Leblanc, I. Petropavlovskikh, B. Sauvage, D.W. Tarasick , Diverging ozone trends above western North America: boundary layer decreases vs. free tropospheric increases, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128, e2022JD038090, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038090
Tags: Dobson, Lidar, Ozone, Sonde, Trends

2022, Stauffer, R.M., A. M. Thompson, D. Kollonige, D. Tarasick, R. Van Malderen, H. G.J. Smit, H. Vömel, G. Morris, B. J. Johnson, P. Cullis, R. Stübi, J. Davies, and M. M. Yan, An Examination of the Recent Stability of Ozonesonde Global Network Data, Earth and Space Science, 9(10), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002459
Tags: Ozone, Sonde, Validation

2022, Konopka, P., ., M. Tao, F. Plöger, D.F. Hurst, M.L. Santee, J.S. Wright, and M. Riese, Stratospheric moistening after 2000, Geophysical Research Letters, 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097609
Tags: H2O, Sonde

2022, Ancellet, G., Godin-Beekmann S., Smit H., Stauffer R., van Malderen R., Bodichon R., Pazmino A., Homogenization of the Observatoire de Haute Provence electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde data record: comparison with lidar and satellite observations, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15 (10), pp.3105-3120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3105-2022
Tags: Lidar, Ozone, Satellite, Sonde

2022, Strahan, S.E., D. Smale, S. Solomon, G. Taha, M. R. Damon, S. D. Steenrod, N. Jones, B. Liley, R. Querel and J. Robinson, Unexpected Repartitioning of Stratospheric Inorganic Chlorine After the 2020 Australian Wildfires, Geophysical Research Letters, 49(14): e2022GL098290
Tags: Cl, Fire, Model

2022, Bahramvash Shams, S., V. P. Walden, J. W. Hannigan, W. J. Randel, I. V. Petropavlovskikh, A. H. Butler, and A. de la Cámara, Analyzing ozone variations and uncertainties at high latitudes during sudden stratospheric warming events using MERRA-2, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22.8, 5435–5458, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5435-2022
Tags: Model, Ozone

2022, Lutsch, E., D. Wunch, D. B. A. Jones, C. Clerbaux, J. W. Hannigan, T.-L. He, I. Ortega, S. Roche, K. Strong, and H. M. Worden, Can the data assimilation of CO from MOPITT or IASI constrain high-latitude wildfire emissions? A Case Study of the 2017 Canadian Wildfires, Earth and Space Science, p. 44, https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10510875.1
Tags: CO, Fire, Model, Satellite

2022, Yang, Z., B. Demoz, R. Delgado, A. Tangborn, P. Lee, and J.T. Sullivan, The Dynamical Role of the Chesapeake Bay on the Local Ozone Pollution Using Mesoscale Modeling—A Case Study, Atmosphere, 13(5), 641
Tags: Lidar, Model, Ozone

2022, Summa, D., F. Madonna, N. Franco, B. De Rosa, and P. Di Girolamo , Inter-comparison of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height estimates from different profiling sensors and models in the framework of HyMeX-SOP1, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 4153–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4153-2022
Tags: Lidar, Model