Publications

2023, Poraicu, C., Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Fonteyn, D., Tack, F., Deutsch, F., Laffineur, Q., Van Malderen, R., and Veldeman, N., Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO2 measurements over Antwerp, Belgium, Geoscientific Model Development, 16, 479–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023
Tags: NO2, Satellite, Sonde

2023, Trieu, T.T.N., et al., Long-range transport of CO and aerosols from Siberian biomass burning over northern Japan during 18-20 May 2016, Environmental Pollution, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121129
Tags: Aerosol, CO, FTIR

2022, Konopka, P., ., M. Tao, F. Plöger, D.F. Hurst, M.L. Santee, J.S. Wright, and M. Riese, Stratospheric moistening after 2000, Geophysical Research Letters, 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097609
Tags: H2O, Sonde

2022, Ancellet, G., Godin-Beekmann S., Smit H., Stauffer R., van Malderen R., Bodichon R., Pazmino A., Homogenization of the Observatoire de Haute Provence electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde data record: comparison with lidar and satellite observations, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15 (10), pp.3105-3120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3105-2022
Tags: Lidar, Ozone, Satellite, Sonde

2022, Stauffer, R.M., A. M. Thompson, D. Kollonige, D. Tarasick, R. Van Malderen, H. G.J. Smit, H. Vömel, G. Morris, B. J. Johnson, P. Cullis, R. Stübi, J. Davies, and M. M. Yan, An Examination of the Recent Stability of Ozonesonde Global Network Data, Earth and Space Science, 9(10), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002459
Tags: Ozone, Sonde, Validation

2022, Shan, C., Wang, W., Xie, Y., Wu, P., Xu, J., Zeng, X., Zha, L., Zhu, Q., Sun, Y., Hu, Q., Liu, C., and Jones, N., Observations of atmospheric CO2 and CO based on in-situ and ground-based remote sensing measurements at Hefei site, Science of the Total Environment, 851, 158188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158188
Tags: CO, CO2, FTIR

2022, Jalali, A., K.A. Walker, K. Strong, R.R. Buchholz, M.N. Deeter, D. Wunch, S. Roche, T. Wizenberg, E. Lutsch, E. McGee, H.M. Worden, P.F. Fogal, and J.R. Drummond, A comparison of carbon monoxide retrievals between the MOPITT satellite and Canadian High-Arctic ground-based NDACC and TCCON FTIR measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 6837–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837- 2022
Tags: CO, FTIR, Satellite

2022, Tinney, E.N., C.R. Homeyer, L. Elizalde, D.F. Hurst, A.M. Thompson, R.M. Stauffer, H. Vömel, and H.B. Selkirk, A modern approach to a stability-based definition of the tropopause, Monthly Weather Review, 150, 3151-3174, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-22-0174.1
Tags: H2O, Ozone, Sonde

2022, Sullivan, J., Apituley, A., Mettig, N., Kreher, K., Knowland, K.E., Allaart, M., Piters, A., Van Roozendael, M.,Veefkind, P.. Ziemke, J.R. Kramarova, N., Weber, M., Rozanov, A., Twigg, L., Sumnicht, G., McGee, T.J., Tropospheric and Stratospheric Ozone Profiles during the 2019 TROpomi vaLIdation eXperiment (TROLIX-19), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 11137–11153, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11137-2022
Tags: Lidar, Satellite, Sonde, UVVis

2022, Lutsch, E., D. Wunch, D. B. A. Jones, C. Clerbaux, J. W. Hannigan, T.-L. He, I. Ortega, S. Roche, K. Strong, and H. M. Worden, Can the data assimilation of CO from MOPITT or IASI constrain high-latitude wildfire emissions? A Case Study of the 2017 Canadian Wildfires, Earth and Space Science, p. 44, https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10510875.1
Tags: CO, Fire, Model, Satellite