Publications
- 25 results
- Tag: Arctic
- Tag: XCH4
- Clear all
2023, Whaley, C.H., Law, K. S., Hjorth, J. L., Skov, H., Arnold, S. R., Langner, J., Pernov, J. B., Bergeron, G., Bourgeois, I., Christensen, J. H., Chien, R.-Y., Deushi, M., Dong, X., Effertz, P., Faluvegi, G., Flanner, M., Fu, J. S., Gauss, M., Huey, G., Im, U., Kivi, R., Marelle, L., Onishi, T., Oshima, N., Petropavlovskikh, I., Peischl, J., Plummer, D. A., Pozzoli, L., Raut, J.-C., Ryerson, T., Skeie, R., Solberg, S., Thomas, M. A., Thompson, C., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S., Turnock, S. T., von Salzen, K., and Tarasick, D. W., Paper 1: Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 637–661, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023
Tags: Arctic, Ozone, Sonde, Tropospheric Ozone
2023, Barten, J.G.M., et al., Low ozone dry deposition rates to sea ice during the MOSAiC field campaign: Implications for the Arctic boundary layer ozone budget, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 11 (1): 00086, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00086
Tags: Arctic, Ozone, Sonde
2022, Butz, A., Hanft V., Kleinschek R., Frey M. M., Müller A., Knapp M., Morino I., Agusti-Panareda A., Hase F., Landgraf J., Vardag S., Tanimoto H., Versatile and Targeted Validation of Space-Borne XCO2, XCH4 and XCO Observations by Mobile Ground-Based Direct-Sun Spectrometers, Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 2, 53, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.775805
Tags: FTIR, Validation, XCH4, XCO, XCO2
2022, Trieu, T.T.N., I. Morino, O. Uchino, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Sakai, T. Nagai, A. Yamazaki, H. Okumura, K. Arai, K. Shiomi, D.F. Pollard, B. Liley , Influences of aerosols and thin cirrus clouds on GOSAT XCO2 and XCH4 using Total Carbon Column Observing Network, sky radiometer, and lidar data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 43:5, 1770-1799, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2038395
Tags: Aerosol, Clouds, FTIR, Lidar, Satellite, UVVis, XCH4, XCO2
2021, Tu, Q., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Schneider, M., Schneider, A., Kivi, R., Heikkinen, P., Ertl, B., Diekmann, C., Khosrawi, F., Sommer, M., Borsdorff, T., and Raffalski, U., Intercomparison of arctic XH2O observations from three ground-based Fourier transform infrared networks and application for satellite validation, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14, 1993–2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1993-2021
Tags: FTIR, Arctic, XH2O, Satellite
2021, von der Gathen, P., Kivi, R., Wohltmann, I. et al., Climate change favours large seasonal loss of Arctic ozone, Nature Communications, 725708, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24089-6
Tags: Arctic, Ozone
2021, Stanevich, I., D.B.A. Jones, K. Strong, M. Keller, D.K. Henze, R.J. Parker, H. Boesch, D. Wunch, J. Notholt, C. Petri, T. Warneke, R. Sussmann, M. Schneider, F. Hase, R. Kivi, N.M. Deutscher, V.A. Velazco, K.A. Walker, and F. Deng, Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: using GOSAT XCH4 data with weak-constraint four-dimensional variational data assimilation, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21, 9545–9572, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021
Tags: FTIR, Satellite, CH4, XCH4
2020, Yang, X., A.-M. Blechschmidt, K. Bognar, A. McClure–Begley, S. Morris, I. Petropavlovskikh, A. Richter, H. Skov, K. Strong, D. Tarasick, T. Uttal, M. Vestenius, X. Zhao , Pan-Arctic surface ozone: modelling vs measurements, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 15937–15967, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15937-2020
Tags: Sonde, Ozone, Arctic, Model
2020, Wohltmann, I., von der Gathen, P., Lehmann, R., Maturilli, M., Deckelmann, H., Manney, G. L., et al. , Near-complete local reduction of Arctic stratospheric ozone by severe chemical loss in spring 2020, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL089547, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089547
Tags: Sonde, Ozone, Arctic
2020, Becagli, S., Caiazzo L., Di Iorio Tatiana, Di Sarra Alcide, Meloni Daniela, Muscari G., Pace G., Severi M., and Traversi R., New insights on metals in the Arctic aerosol in a climate changing world, Science of the Total Environment, 741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140511
Tags: Aerosol, Arctic, Lidar