Publications

2023, Poraicu, C., Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Fonteyn, D., Tack, F., Deutsch, F., Laffineur, Q., Van Malderen, R., and Veldeman, N., Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO2 measurements over Antwerp, Belgium, Geoscientific Model Development, 16, 479–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023
Tags: NO2, Satellite, Sonde

2023, Farhani, G., Martucci, G., Roberts, T., Haefele, A., Sica, R.J., A Bayesian neural network approach for tropospheric temperature retrievals from a lidar instrument, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 44:5, 1611-1627, http://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2187723
Tags: Algorithm, Lidar, Temperature

2022, Cordero, R.R., S. Feron, A. Damiani, A. Redondas, J. Carrasco, E. Sepúlveda, J. Jorquera, et al. , Persistent extreme ultraviolet irradiance in Antarctica despite the ozone recovery onset, Scientific Reports, 12, 1, p1-10
Tags: Ozone, Spectral UV

2022, Trieu, T.T.N., I. Morino, O. Uchino, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Sakai, T. Nagai, A. Yamazaki, H. Okumura, K. Arai, K. Shiomi, D.F. Pollard, B. Liley , Influences of aerosols and thin cirrus clouds on GOSAT XCO2 and XCH4 using Total Carbon Column Observing Network, sky radiometer, and lidar data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 43:5, 1770-1799, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2038395
Tags: Aerosol, Clouds, FTIR, Lidar, Satellite, UVVis, XCH4, XCO2

2021, Sepúlveda, E., Cordero, R.R., Damiani, A. et al., Evaluation of Antarctic Ozone Profiles derived from OMPS-LP by using Balloon-borne Ozonesondes, Scientific Reports, 872506, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81954-6
Tags: CalVal, Ozone, Satellite, Sonde

2021, Tritscher, I., Michael C. Pitts, Lamont R. Poole, Simon P. Alexander, Francesco Cairo, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Jens-Uwe Gross, Michael Hoepfner, Alyn Lambert, Beiping Luo, Sergey Molleker, Andrew Orr, Ross Salawitch, Marcel Snels, Reinhold Spang, Wolfgang Woiwode, Thomas Peter, Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion, Reviews of Geophysics, 59, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000702
Tags: Lidar, PSC, Ozone

2020, Stanevich, I., Jones, D. B. A., Strong, K., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Wunch, D., Notholt, J., Petri, C., Warneke, T., Sussmann, R., Schneider, M., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Walker, K. A., and Deng, F, Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model, Geoscientific Model Development, 13, 3829–3862, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
Tags: FTIR, Model, CH4

2020, Polyakov, A., Y. Virolainen, A. Poberovskiy, M. Makarova and Y. Timofeyev, Atmospheric HCFC-22 total columns near St. Petersburg: stabilization with start of a decrease, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(11), 4365-4371, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1717668
Tags: FTIR, HCFC-22, Trends

2020, Sterckx, S., Ian Brown, Andreas Kääb, Maarten Krol, Rosemary Morrow, Pepijn Veefkind, K. Folkert Boersma, Martine De Mazière, Nigel Fox & Peter Thorne, Towards a European Cal/Val service for earth observation, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41:12, 4496-4511, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1718240
Tags: FTIR, Validation

2019, McKenzie, R., G. Bernhard, B. Liley, P. Disterhoft, S. Rhodes, A. Bais, O. Morgenstern, P. Newman, L. Oman, C. Brogniez and S. Simic, Success of Montreal Protocol demonstrated by comparing high-quality UV Measurements with “World Avoided” calculations from two chemistry-climate models, Scientific Reports, 9, 12332, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48625-z
Tags: Model, Spectral UV