Publications
2023, Ratynski, M., Khaykin, S., Hauchecorne, A., Wing, R., Cammas, J.-P., Hello, Y., Keckhut, P., Validation of Aeolus wind profiles using ground-based lidar and radiosonde observations at Réunion island and the Observatoire de Haute-Provence, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 16, 997–1016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-997-2023,
Tags: Lidar, Validation, Wind
2023, Trieu, T.T.N., et al., Long-range transport of CO and aerosols from Siberian biomass burning over northern Japan during 18-20 May 2016, Environmental Pollution, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121129
Tags: Aerosol, CO, FTIR
2022, Zeng, X., Wang, W., Liu, C., Shan, C., Xie, Y., Wu, P., Zhu, Q., Zhou, M., De Mazière, M., Mahieu, E., Pardo Cantos, I., Makkor, J., and Polyakov, A., Retrieval of atmospheric CFC-11 and CFC-12 from high-resolution FTIR observations at Hefei and comparisons with other independent datasets, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 6739–6754, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6739-2022
Tags: CFC, FTIR, Validation
2022, Karagkiozidis, D., Friedrich, M. M., Beirle, S., Bais, A., Hendrick, F., Voudouri, K. A., Fountoulakis, I., Karanikolas, A., Tzoumaka, P., Van Roozendael, M., Balis, D., and Wagner, T., Retrieval of tropospheric aerosol, NO2, and HCHO vertical profiles from MAX-DOAS observations over Thessaloniki, Greece: intercomparison and validation of two inversion algorithms, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 1269–1301, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1269-2022
Tags: Aerosol, Algorithm, CalVal, HCHO, NO2, UVVis
2022, Pinardi, G., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Richter, A., Valks, P., Alwarda, R., Bognar, K., Frieß, U., Granville, J., Gu, M., Johnston, P., Prados-Roman, C., Querel, R., Strong, K., Wagner, T., Wittrock, F., and Yela Gonzalez, M., Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 3439–3463, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022
Tags: OClO, Satellite, UVVis, Validation
2022, Chouza, F., Leblanc, T., Brewer, M., Wang, P., Martucci, G., Haefele, A., Vérèmes, H., Duflot,
V., Payen, G., and Keckhut, P., The impact of aerosol fluorescence on long-term water vapor monitoring by Raman lidar and evaluation of a potential correction method, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 4241–4256, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4241-2022
Tags: Aerosol, H2O, Lidar
2022, Lei, L., Berkoff, T. A., Gronoff, G., Su, J., Nehrir, A. R., Wu, Y., ... & Kuang, S, Retrieval of UVB aerosol extinction profiles from the ground-based Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) system, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 5(8), 2465-2478
Tags: Aerosol, Lidar, Ozone, UVB
2021, Hubert, D., K.-P. Heue, J-C. Lambert, T. Verhoelst, M. Allaart, S. Compernolle, P. D. Cullis, A. Dehn, C. Félix, B. J. Johnson, A. Keppens, D. E. Kollonige, C. Lerot, D. Loyola, M. Mohamad, F. R. daSilva, A. Piters, H. Selkirk, A. M. Thompson, J. P. Veefkind, H. Vömel, J. C. Witte, C. Zehner, TROPOMI tropospheric ozone column data: Geophysical assessment and comparison to ozonesondes, GOME-2B and OMI, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14, 7405–7433, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021
Tags: Ozone, Satellite, Sonde, Validation
2021, Wing, R., S. Godin-Beekmann, W. Steinbrecht, T.J. Mcgee, J.T. Sullivan, S. Khaykin, G. Sumnicht, and L. Twigg, Evaluation of the new DWD ozone and temperature lidar during the Hohenpeißenberg Ozone Profiling Study (HOPS) and comparison of results with previous NDACC campaigns, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14(5), 3773-3794, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3773-2021
Tags: Lidar, Ozone, Temperature, Validation
2020, Kreher, K., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Apituley, A., Dimitropoulou, E., Frieß, U., Richter, A., Wagner, T., Lampel, J., Abuhassan, N., Ang, L., Anguas, M., Bais, A., Benavent, N., Bösch, T., Bognar, K., Borovski, A., Bruchkouski, I., Cede, A., Chan, K. L., Donner, S., Drosoglou, T., Fayt, C., Finkenzeller, H., Garcia-Nieto, D., Gielen, C., Gómez-Martín, L., Hao, N., Henzing, B., Herman, J. R., Hermans, C., Hoque, S., Irie, H., Jin, J., Johnston, P., Khayyam Butt, J., Khokhar, F., Koenig, T. K., Kuhn, J., Kumar, V., Liu, C., Ma, J., Merlaud, A., Mishra, A. K., Müller, M., Navarro-Comas, M., Ostendorf, M., Pazmino, A., Peters, E., Pinardi, G., Pinharanda, M., Piters, A., Platt, U., Postylyakov, O., Prados-Roman, C., Puentedura, O., Querel, R., Saiz-Lopez, A., Schönhardt, A., Schreier, S. F., Seyler, A., Sinha, V., Spinei, E., Strong, K., Tack, F., Tian, X., Tiefengraber, M., Tirpitz, J.-L., van Gent, J., Volkamer, R., Vrekoussis, M., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Wenig, M., Wittrock, F., Xie, P. H., Xu, J., Yela, M., Zhang, C., and Zhao, X., Intercomparison of NO2, O4, O3 and HCHO slant column measurements by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV–visible spectrometers during CINDI-2, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13, 2169–2208, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2169-2020
Tags: HCHO, NO2, O4, Ozone, UVVis, Validation