Publications

2023, Whaley, C.H., Law, K. S., Hjorth, J. L., Skov, H., Arnold, S. R., Langner, J., Pernov, J. B., Bergeron, G., Bourgeois, I., Christensen, J. H., Chien, R.-Y., Deushi, M., Dong, X., Effertz, P., Faluvegi, G., Flanner, M., Fu, J. S., Gauss, M., Huey, G., Im, U., Kivi, R., Marelle, L., Onishi, T., Oshima, N., Petropavlovskikh, I., Peischl, J., Plummer, D. A., Pozzoli, L., Raut, J.-C., Ryerson, T., Skeie, R., Solberg, S., Thomas, M. A., Thompson, C., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S., Turnock, S. T., von Salzen, K., and Tarasick, D. W., Paper 1: Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 637–661, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023
Tags: Arctic, Ozone, Sonde, Tropospheric Ozone

2022, Trieu, T.T.N., I. Morino, O. Uchino, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Sakai, T. Nagai, A. Yamazaki, H. Okumura, K. Arai, K. Shiomi, D.F. Pollard, B. Liley , Influences of aerosols and thin cirrus clouds on GOSAT XCO2 and XCH4 using Total Carbon Column Observing Network, sky radiometer, and lidar data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 43:5, 1770-1799, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2038395
Tags: Aerosol, Clouds, FTIR, Lidar, Satellite, UVVis, XCH4, XCO2

2022, Lei, L., Berkoff, T. A., Gronoff, G., Su, J., Nehrir, A. R., Wu, Y., ... & Kuang, S, Retrieval of UVB aerosol extinction profiles from the ground-based Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) system, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 5(8), 2465-2478
Tags: Aerosol, Lidar, Ozone, UVB

2022, McKenzie, R. , Liley, B., Kotkamp, M. et al., Relationship between ozone and biologically relevant UV at 4 NDACC sites, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00281-5
Tags: Ozone, Spectral UV, UVB

2022, Bernhard, G.H., McKenzie, R.L., Lantz, K. et al., Updated analysis of data from Palmer Station, Antarctica (64° S), and San Diego, California (32° N), confirms large effect of the Antarctic ozone hole on UV radiation, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 21, 373–384, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00178-3
Tags: Ozone, Polar, Spectral UV, UVB

2022, Butz, A., Hanft V., Kleinschek R., Frey M. M., Müller A., Knapp M., Morino I., Agusti-Panareda A., Hase F., Landgraf J., Vardag S., Tanimoto H., Versatile and Targeted Validation of Space-Borne XCO2, XCH4 and XCO Observations by Mobile Ground-Based Direct-Sun Spectrometers, Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 2, 53, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.775805
Tags: FTIR, Validation, XCH4, XCO, XCO2

2021, Steinbrecht, W., Kubistin, D., Plass-Dülmer, C., Davies, J., Tarasick, D. W., von der Gathen, P., et al. , COVID-19 crisis reduces free tropospheric ozone across the Northern Hemisphere, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2020GL091987, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091987
Tags: FTIR, Tropospheric Ozone

2021, Stanevich, I., D.B.A. Jones, K. Strong, M. Keller, D.K. Henze, R.J. Parker, H. Boesch, D. Wunch, J. Notholt, C. Petri, T. Warneke, R. Sussmann, M. Schneider, F. Hase, R. Kivi, N.M. Deutscher, V.A. Velazco, K.A. Walker, and F. Deng, Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: using GOSAT XCH4 data with weak-constraint four-dimensional variational data assimilation, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21, 9545–9572, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021
Tags: FTIR, Satellite, CH4, XCH4

2021, Griffiths, P.T., L.T. Murray, G. Zeng, Y.M. Shin, N.L. Abraham, A.T. Archibald, M. Deushi, L. Emmons, I.E. Galbally, B. Hassler, L.W. Horowitz, J. Keeble, J. Liu, O. Moeini, V. Naik, F.M. O’Connor, D. Tarasick, S. Tilmes, S.T. Turnock, O. Wild, P.J. Young and P. Zanis, Tropospheric Ozone in CMIP6 Simulations, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21, 4187–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021
Tags: Sonde, Tropospheric Ozone

2021, Kumar, P., J. Kuttippurath, P. von der Gathen, I. Petropavlovskikh, B. Johnson, A. McClure-Begley, P. Cristofanelli, P. Bonasoni, M. E. Barlasina, and R. Sanchez, The Increasing Surface Ozone and Tropospheric Ozone in Antarctica and Their Possible Drivers, Environmental Science & Technology, 55 (13), 8542–8553, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08491
Tags: Sonde, Tropospheric Ozone