Publications

2022, Pinardi, G., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Richter, A., Valks, P., Alwarda, R., Bognar, K., Frieß, U., Granville, J., Gu, M., Johnston, P., Prados-Roman, C., Querel, R., Strong, K., Wagner, T., Wittrock, F., and Yela Gonzalez, M., Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 3439–3463, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022
Tags: OClO, Satellite, UVVis, Validation

2022, Konopka, P., ., M. Tao, F. Plöger, D.F. Hurst, M.L. Santee, J.S. Wright, and M. Riese, Stratospheric moistening after 2000, Geophysical Research Letters, 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097609
Tags: H2O, Sonde

2022, Read, W.J., G. Stiller, S. Lossow, M. Kiefer, F. Khosrawi, D. Hurst, H. Vömel, K. Rosenlof, B.M. Dinelli, P. Raspollini, G.E. Nedoluha, J.C. Gille, Y. Kasai, P. Eriksson, C.E. Sioris, K.A. Walker, K. Weigel, J.P. Burrows, and A. Rozanov, The SPARC Water Vapor Assessment II: assessment of satellite measurements of upper tropospheric humidity, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 3377-3400, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3377-2022
Tags: H2O, Satellite, Sonde

2022, Di Paolantonio, M., Dionisi, D., and Liberti, G. L., A semi-automated procedure for the emitter–receiver geometry characterization of motor-controlled lidars, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 1217–1231, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1217-2022
Tags: Lidar

2022, Chouza, F., Leblanc, T., Brewer, M., Wang, P., Martucci, G., Haefele, A., Vérèmes, H., Duflot, V., Payen, G., and Keckhut, P., The impact of aerosol fluorescence on long-term water vapor monitoring by Raman lidar and evaluation of a potential correction method, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 4241–4256, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4241-2022
Tags: Aerosol, H2O, Lidar

2022, Summa, D., F. Madonna, N. Franco, B. De Rosa, and P. Di Girolamo , Inter-comparison of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height estimates from different profiling sensors and models in the framework of HyMeX-SOP1, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 4153–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4153-2022
Tags: Lidar, Model

2022, Ancellet, G., Godin-Beekmann S., Smit H., Stauffer R., van Malderen R., Bodichon R., Pazmino A., Homogenization of the Observatoire de Haute Provence electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde data record: comparison with lidar and satellite observations, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15 (10), pp.3105-3120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3105-2022
Tags: Lidar, Ozone, Satellite, Sonde

2022, Mettig, N., Weber, M., Rozanov, A., Burrows, J. P., Veefkind, P., Thompson, A. M., ... & Skrivankova, P., Combined UV and IR ozone profile retrieval from TROPOMI and CrIS measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15(9), 2955-2978, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2955-2022
Tags: Lidar, Ozone, Satellite

2022, Lei, L., Berkoff, T. A., Gronoff, G., Su, J., Nehrir, A. R., Wu, Y., ... & Kuang, S, Retrieval of UVB aerosol extinction profiles from the ground-based Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) system, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 5(8), 2465-2478
Tags: Aerosol, Lidar, Ozone, UVB

2022, Strahan, S.E., D. Smale, S. Solomon, G. Taha, M. R. Damon, S. D. Steenrod, N. Jones, B. Liley, R. Querel and J. Robinson, Unexpected Repartitioning of Stratospheric Inorganic Chlorine After the 2020 Australian Wildfires, Geophysical Research Letters, 49(14): e2022GL098290
Tags: Cl, Fire, Model