Publications

2023, Poraicu, C., Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Fonteyn, D., Tack, F., Deutsch, F., Laffineur, Q., Van Malderen, R., and Veldeman, N., Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO2 measurements over Antwerp, Belgium, Geoscientific Model Development, 16, 479–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023
Tags: NO2, Satellite, Sonde

2023, Tu, Q., Hase, F., Chen, Z., Schneider, M., García, O., Khosrawi, F., Chen, S., Blumenstock, T., Liu, F., Qin, K., Cohen, J., He, Q., Lin, S., Jiang, H., and Fang, D., Estimation of NO2 emission strengths over Riyadh and Madrid from space from a combination of wind-assigned anomalies and a machine learning technique, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 16, 2237–2262, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2237-2023
Tags: FTIR, NO2

2023, Karagkiozidis, D., Koukouli M-E, Bais A, Balis D, Tzoumaka P., Assessment of the NO2 Spatio-Temporal Variability over Thessaloniki, Greece, Using MAX-DOAS Measurements and Comparison with S5P/TROPOMI Observations, Applied Sciences, 13(4):2641, https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042641
Tags: NO2, Satellite, UVVis

2023, Wizenberg, T., K. Strong, D.B.A. Jones, E. Lutsch, E. Mahieu, B. Franco, and L. Clarisse, Exceptional wildfire enhancements of PAN, C2H4, CH3OH, and HCOOH over the Canadian high Arctic during August 2017, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128, e2022JD038052, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038052
Tags: C2H4, CH3OH, Fire, FTIR, HCOOH

2023, Barten, J.G.M., et al., Low ozone dry deposition rates to sea ice during the MOSAiC field campaign: Implications for the Arctic boundary layer ozone budget, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 11 (1): 00086, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00086
Tags: Arctic, Ozone, Sonde

2023, Whaley, C.H., Law, K. S., Hjorth, J. L., Skov, H., Arnold, S. R., Langner, J., Pernov, J. B., Bergeron, G., Bourgeois, I., Christensen, J. H., Chien, R.-Y., Deushi, M., Dong, X., Effertz, P., Faluvegi, G., Flanner, M., Fu, J. S., Gauss, M., Huey, G., Im, U., Kivi, R., Marelle, L., Onishi, T., Oshima, N., Petropavlovskikh, I., Peischl, J., Plummer, D. A., Pozzoli, L., Raut, J.-C., Ryerson, T., Skeie, R., Solberg, S., Thomas, M. A., Thompson, C., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S., Turnock, S. T., von Salzen, K., and Tarasick, D. W., Paper 1: Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 637–661, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023
Tags: Arctic, Ozone, Sonde, Tropospheric Ozone

2022, Tencé, F. , Jumelet, J., Bekki, S., Khaykin, S., Sarkissian, A., & Keckhut, P., Australian Black Summer Smoke Observed by Lidar at the French Antarctic Station Dumont d’Urville, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127, e2021JD035349, https://doi. org/10.1029/2021JD035349
Tags: Aerosol, Fire, Lidar, Sonde

2022, Lutsch, E., D. Wunch, D. B. A. Jones, C. Clerbaux, J. W. Hannigan, T.-L. He, I. Ortega, S. Roche, K. Strong, and H. M. Worden, Can the data assimilation of CO from MOPITT or IASI constrain high-latitude wildfire emissions? A Case Study of the 2017 Canadian Wildfires, Earth and Space Science, p. 44, https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10510875.1
Tags: CO, Fire, Model, Satellite

2022, Kotsakis, A., John T. Sullivan, Thomas F. Hanisco, Robert J. Swap, Vanessa Caicedo, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff et al., Sensitivity of total column NO2 at a marine site within the Chesapeake Bay during OWLETS-2, Atmospheric Environment, 277, 119063
Tags: Lidar, NO2

2022, Strahan, S.E., D. Smale, S. Solomon, G. Taha, M. R. Damon, S. D. Steenrod, N. Jones, B. Liley, R. Querel and J. Robinson, Unexpected Repartitioning of Stratospheric Inorganic Chlorine After the 2020 Australian Wildfires, Geophysical Research Letters, 49(14): e2022GL098290
Tags: Cl, Fire, Model