Publications

2022, Bernhard, G.H., McKenzie, R.L., Lantz, K. et al., Updated analysis of data from Palmer Station, Antarctica (64° S), and San Diego, California (32° N), confirms large effect of the Antarctic ozone hole on UV radiation, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 21, 373–384, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00178-3
Tags: Ozone, Polar, Spectral UV, UVB

2022, Strahan, S.E., D. Smale, S. Solomon, G. Taha, M. R. Damon, S. D. Steenrod, N. Jones, B. Liley, R. Querel and J. Robinson, Unexpected Repartitioning of Stratospheric Inorganic Chlorine After the 2020 Australian Wildfires, Geophysical Research Letters, 49(14): e2022GL098290
Tags: Cl, Fire, Model

2022, Summa, D., F. Madonna, N. Franco, B. De Rosa, and P. Di Girolamo , Inter-comparison of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height estimates from different profiling sensors and models in the framework of HyMeX-SOP1, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 4153–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4153-2022
Tags: Lidar, Model

2022, Lutsch, E., D. Wunch, D. B. A. Jones, C. Clerbaux, J. W. Hannigan, T.-L. He, I. Ortega, S. Roche, K. Strong, and H. M. Worden, Can the data assimilation of CO from MOPITT or IASI constrain high-latitude wildfire emissions? A Case Study of the 2017 Canadian Wildfires, Earth and Space Science, p. 44, https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10510875.1
Tags: CO, Fire, Model, Satellite

2021, Wohltmann, I., ., von der Gathen, P., Lehmann, R., Deckelmann, H., Manney, G. L., Davies, J., et al. , Chemical evolution of the exceptional Arctic stratospheric winter 2019/2020 compared to previous Arctic and Antarctic winters, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126, e2020JD034356, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034356
Tags: Ozone, Polar, Sonde

2021, Prignon, M., Chabrillat, S., Friedrich, M., Smale, D., Strahan, S. E., Bernath, P. F., Chipperfield, M. P., Dhomse, S. S., Feng, W., Minganti, D., Servais, C. and Mahieu, E., Stratospheric fluorine as a tracer of circulation changes: comparison between infrared remote‐sensing observations and simulations with five modern reanalyses, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(19), https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034995
Tags: F, FTIR, Model

2021, Schanz, A., Hocke, K.; Kämpfer, N.; Chabrillat, S.; Inness, A.; Palm, M.; Notholt, J.; Boyd, I.; Parrish, A.; Kasai, Y., The Diurnal Variation in Stratospheric Ozone from MACC Reanalysis, ERA-Interim, WACCM, and Earth Observation Data: Characteristics and Intercomparison, Atmosphere, 12, 625, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050625
Tags: Microwave, Diurnal, Ozone, Model

2021, Rivera Cárdenas, C., Guarín, C., Stremme, W., Friedrich, M. M., Bezanilla, A., Rivera Ramos, D., Mendoza-Rodríguez, C. A., Grutter, M., Blumenstock, T., Hase, F., Formaldehyde total column densities over Mexico City: comparison between multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy and solar-absorption Fourier transform infrared measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14, 595–613, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-595-2021
Tags: CH2O, FTIR

2021, De Smedt, I., Pinardi, G., Vigouroux, C., Compernolle, S., Bais, A., Benavent, N., Boersma, F., Chan, K.-L., Donner, S., Eichmann, K.-U., Hedelt, P., Hendrick, F., Irie, H., Kumar, V., Lambert, J.-C., Langerock, B., Lerot, C., Liu, C., Loyola, D., Piters, A., Richter, A., Rivera Cárdenas, C., Romahn, F., Ryan, R. G., Sinha, V., Theys, N., Vlietinck, J., Wagner, T., Wang, T., Yu, H., and Van Roozendael, M, Comparative assessment of TROPOMI and OMI formaldehyde observations and validation against MAX-DOAS network column measurements, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21, 12561–12593, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12561-2021
Tags: CH2O, Satellite, UVVis

2021, Meng, L., J. Liu, D.W. Tarasick and Y. Li , Biases of Global Tropopause Altitude Products in Reanalyses and Implications for Estimates of Tropospheric Column Ozone, Atmosphere, 12, 417, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12040417
Tags: Sonde, Ozone, Model