Publications

2022, Knowland, K.E., C. A. Keller, P. A. Wales, K. Wargan, L. Coy, M. S. Johnson, J. Liu, R. A. Lucchesi, S. D. Eastham, E. Fleming, Q. Liang, T. Leblanc, N. J. Livesey, K. A. Walker, L. E. Ott, S. Pawson, NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS-CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14(6), e2021MS002852, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002852
Tags: Aerosol, Lidar, Model

2022, Strahan, S.E., D. Smale, S. Solomon, G. Taha, M. R. Damon, S. D. Steenrod, N. Jones, B. Liley, R. Querel and J. Robinson, Unexpected Repartitioning of Stratospheric Inorganic Chlorine After the 2020 Australian Wildfires, Geophysical Research Letters, 49(14): e2022GL098290
Tags: Cl, Fire, Model

2022, Tencé, F. , Jumelet, J., Bekki, S., Khaykin, S., Sarkissian, A., & Keckhut, P., Australian Black Summer Smoke Observed by Lidar at the French Antarctic Station Dumont d’Urville, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127, e2021JD035349, https://doi. org/10.1029/2021JD035349
Tags: Aerosol, Fire, Lidar, Sonde

2022, Lutsch, E., D. Wunch, D. B. A. Jones, C. Clerbaux, J. W. Hannigan, T.-L. He, I. Ortega, S. Roche, K. Strong, and H. M. Worden, Can the data assimilation of CO from MOPITT or IASI constrain high-latitude wildfire emissions? A Case Study of the 2017 Canadian Wildfires, Earth and Space Science, p. 44, https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10510875.1
Tags: CO, Fire, Model, Satellite

2022, Callewaert, S., Brioude, J., Langerock, B., Duflot, V., Fonteyn, D., Müller, J.-F., Metzger, J.-M., Hermans, C., Kumps, N., Ramonet, M., Lopez, M., Mahieu, E. and De Mazière, M, Analysis of CO2, CH4, and CO surface and column concentrations observed at Réunion Island by assessing WRF-Chem simulations, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(11), 7763–7792, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7763-2022
Tags: CH4, CO, CO2, FTIR

2022, Jalali, A., K.A. Walker, K. Strong, R.R. Buchholz, M.N. Deeter, D. Wunch, S. Roche, T. Wizenberg, E. Lutsch, E. McGee, H.M. Worden, P.F. Fogal, and J.R. Drummond, A comparison of carbon monoxide retrievals between the MOPITT satellite and Canadian High-Arctic ground-based NDACC and TCCON FTIR measurements, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 6837–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837- 2022
Tags: CO, FTIR, Satellite

2022, Shan, C., Wang, W., Xie, Y., Wu, P., Xu, J., Zeng, X., Zha, L., Zhu, Q., Sun, Y., Hu, Q., Liu, C., and Jones, N., Observations of atmospheric CO2 and CO based on in-situ and ground-based remote sensing measurements at Hefei site, Science of the Total Environment, 851, 158188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158188
Tags: CO, CO2, FTIR

2022, Summa, D., F. Madonna, N. Franco, B. De Rosa, and P. Di Girolamo , Inter-comparison of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height estimates from different profiling sensors and models in the framework of HyMeX-SOP1, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 4153–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4153-2022
Tags: Lidar, Model

2022, Yang, Z., B. Demoz, R. Delgado, A. Tangborn, P. Lee, and J.T. Sullivan, The Dynamical Role of the Chesapeake Bay on the Local Ozone Pollution Using Mesoscale Modeling—A Case Study, Atmosphere, 13(5), 641
Tags: Lidar, Model, Ozone

2021, Wizenberg, T., K. Strong, K. Walker, E. Lutsch, T. Borsdorff, and J. Landgraf, Intercomparison of CO measurements from TROPOMI, ACE-FTS, and a high-Arctic ground-based Fourier transform spectrometer, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14, 7707-7728, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7707-2021
Tags: CO, FTIR, Satellite