Publications

2021, Tritscher, I., Michael C. Pitts, Lamont R. Poole, Simon P. Alexander, Francesco Cairo, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Jens-Uwe Gross, Michael Hoepfner, Alyn Lambert, Beiping Luo, Sergey Molleker, Andrew Orr, Ross Salawitch, Marcel Snels, Reinhold Spang, Wolfgang Woiwode, Thomas Peter, Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion, Reviews of Geophysics, 59, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000702
Tags: Lidar, PSC, Ozone

2021, Marlton, G., et al., Using a network of temperature lidars to identify temperature biases in the upper stratosphere in ECMWF reanalyses, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(8), 6079–6092, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6079-2021
Tags: Lidar, Model, Temperature

2021, Mahieu, E., E. V. Fischer, B. Franco, M. Palm, T. Wizenberg, D. Smale, L. Clarisse, C. Clerbaux, P.-F. Coheur, J. W. Hannigan, E. Lutsch, J. Notholt, I. P. Cantos, M. Prignon, C. Servais, and K. Strong, First retrievals of peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) from ground-based FTIR solar spectra recorded at remote sites, comparison with model and satellite data, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00027
Tags: FTIR, Model, Satellite

2021, Meng, L., J. Liu, D.W. Tarasick and Y. Li , Biases of Global Tropopause Altitude Products in Reanalyses and Implications for Estimates of Tropospheric Column Ozone, Atmosphere, 12, 417, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12040417
Tags: Sonde, Ozone, Model

2021, Snels, M., Francesco Cairo, Luca Di Liberto, Andrea Scoccione, Marco Bracaglia, Terry Deshler, Comparison of Coincident Optical Particle Counter and Lidar Measurements of Polar Stratospheric Clouds above McMurdo (77.85S, 166.67E) from 1994 to 1999, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126, 6
Tags: Lidar, PSC

2021, Schanz, A., Hocke, K.; Kämpfer, N.; Chabrillat, S.; Inness, A.; Palm, M.; Notholt, J.; Boyd, I.; Parrish, A.; Kasai, Y., The Diurnal Variation in Stratospheric Ozone from MACC Reanalysis, ERA-Interim, WACCM, and Earth Observation Data: Characteristics and Intercomparison, Atmosphere, 12, 625, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050625
Tags: Microwave, Diurnal, Ozone, Model

2020, Yang, X., A.-M. Blechschmidt, K. Bognar, A. McClure–Begley, S. Morris, I. Petropavlovskikh, A. Richter, H. Skov, K. Strong, D. Tarasick, T. Uttal, M. Vestenius, X. Zhao , Pan-Arctic surface ozone: modelling vs measurements, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 15937–15967, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15937-2020
Tags: Sonde, Ozone, Arctic, Model

2020, Blechschmidt, A.-M., Arteta, J., Coman, A., Curier, L., Eskes, H., Foret, G., Gielen, C., Hendrick, F., Marécal, V., Meleux, F., Parmentier, J., Peters, E., Pinardi, G., Piters, A. J. M., Plu, M., Richter, A., Segers, A., Sofiev, M., Valdebenito, Á. M., Van Roozendael, M., Vira, J., Vlemmix, T., and Burrows, J. P., Comparison of tropospheric NO2 columns from MAX-DOAS retrievals and regional air quality model simulations, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 2795–2823, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2795-2020
Tags: Model, NO2, UVVis

2020, Stanevich, I., Jones, D. B. A., Strong, K., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Wunch, D., Notholt, J., Petri, C., Warneke, T., Sussmann, R., Schneider, M., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Walker, K. A., and Deng, F, Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model, Geoscientific Model Development, 13, 3829–3862, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
Tags: FTIR, Model, CH4

2020, Tu, Q., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Kivi, R., Heikkinen, P., Sha, M. K., Raffalski, U., Landgraf, J., Lorente, A., Borsdorff, T., Chen, H., Dietrich, F., and Chen, J., Intercomparison of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 abundances on regional scales in boreal areas using Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) analysis, COllaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON) spectrometers, and Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite observations, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13, 4751–4771, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4751-2020
Tags: CH4, CO2, FTIR, Model